Art
Spiegelman’s Pulitzer-winning Maus is
a memoir of his parents’ struggles during the Holocaust, and that of the
relationships and habits his father held to his final years. The novel begins
as a project to document the experiences of surviving father Vladek, but
conflicts involving his new wife, Mala, and the absence of his first wife,
Anja, often interfere. For Spiegelman, who often depicts himself becoming irate
with his father, seems to use this project to reflect on the hardships in his
life that he can’t change – the Holocaust, his mother’s suicide, his father’s
obsessive rationing habits, and eventually his father’s death.
Last year I
took an extensive course over the Holocaust, its causes and effects (some of
which are still current), its infamous but notable figures, and its roots in
antisemitism (which I’ve learned is one
non-hyphenated word) and eugenics. However, despite the overwhelming wealth of
information I’ve acquired, I feel there is much more to discover. That’s what I
find most interesting about the Holocaust – countless stories have resulted
from this calamity, from survivors to SS guards to German and Polish citizens
that were kept unaware of the death camps.
While
reading Maus, I kept in mind the
stories I have heard before. Vladek’s account actually had the most parallels
to a guest speaker that presented his story to the aforementioned class (which
has been recorded and is now kept on closed reserve in Kimbrough Library) – not
just because both are survivors, but both seemed to keep their emotions to themselves.
That’s not to say both survivors became cold and unfeeling in the camps, they
were just too focused on outliving the camps, despite the various unknown
probabilities - not everyone knew of the gas chambers and other atrocities at
first, this information circulated by word of mouth. Both still took the time
to give to others, and were able to take advantage of their situation while
hurting the least people possible (working with Kapo, escaping during the long
walk out of the camps).
What I
found the most intriguing about Maus
was how Vladek was forever affected by the Holocaust. He could not bring
himself to part with his belongings. He would reuse teabags and glue broken
dishes back together, regardless of his wealth, which actually aided him and
his loved ones many times throughout the Holocaust. His first wife (and what
may be his one true love), Anja, who suffered with him, may have contributed to
this habit. She committed suicide about 20 years after World War II ended. I
think this devastating loss may have prompted or accelerated Vladek’s need to
keep things for as long as possible. However, he destroyed almost all evidence
of Anja because his memories of her were too strong for him to deal with
properly. Vladek did not seem to show much remorse for his actions, which
infuriated Art. The first half of the story ends with this, and the mood
carries until the end, when Vladek finishes his story abruptly with the very
moment he and Anja are reunited after being kept in separate camps.
Maus ends with Vladek’s death, even
though it is addressed in the middle of the second installment. At that point,
Art is depressed by not having Anja’s side of the story, and how he was angry
with Vladek. However, this does feel resolved at the book’s end, as Vladek
finally does get to finish his story, albeit suddenly.
***On a separate note, I did want to point out that I made the connection as to how the Jewish characters are drawn as mice because antisemites really referred to them as vermin, but that didn't really play a part in the narrative, except to distinguish Jewish characters from Poles and Germans. For me, the story would have come across the same, wether the characters were animals or humans.
***On a separate note, I did want to point out that I made the connection as to how the Jewish characters are drawn as mice because antisemites really referred to them as vermin, but that didn't really play a part in the narrative, except to distinguish Jewish characters from Poles and Germans. For me, the story would have come across the same, wether the characters were animals or humans.
No comments:
Post a Comment